nGPz content - New Engine Design

[Dave Daniels]

Details, details. If they do there dilligence, this could be a very good design.

--- On Sun, 3/29/09, schnowz <schnowz at att.net> wrote:

From: schnowz <schnowz at att.net>
Subject: RE: nGPz content - New Engine Design
To: gpzlist at micapeak.com
Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 2:52 PM

    Interesting, though the claim of 3 moving parts is a exaggeration. I see 2
caps 4 pistons and 4 balls.
The hardest part of any new idea is the implementation.
   I remember Mazda had mucho problems witht the seals on there rotary engines
initially, and this looks like it would be more difficult - especially as it
wears. With a conventional engine the rings can expand to accommodate some of
the wear.
  Still nothing ventured  -  nothing gained..

     Pete S